Rizqona Maharani, Marsigit Marsigit, Ariyadi Wijaya
This study examined the effect of collaborative learning with a scientific approach (SA) on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the students’ multiple intelligences. This study compared two types of collaborative learning models, Three Steps Interview (TSI), and Think Pair Share (TPS). The participants of this study were grade 8 students of Secondary Schools in Sukoharjo, Central Java, Indonesia (N = 262). This study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3 × 3 factorial design. The results of the study can be concluded as follows. (1) TSI with a scientific approach got better math learning achievement than TPS with a scientific approach and classical with a scientific approach. Besides, TPS with a scientific approach got better learning achievement than classical with a scientific approach. (2) Students with logical-mathematical intelligence got better math learning achievement than students with linguistic intelligence and students with interpersonal intelligence, students with linguistic intelligence got better math learning achievement than students with interpersonal intelligence. © 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Educational Sciences Department, Graduate School, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia & Department of Mathematics Education, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kudus, Central Java, Indonesia; Mathematics Education Department, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
